A- de 2003
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis
✓Claimant Roger Lemis Socarras Lastra
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Procedencia
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Se remitió al Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca -Sección Tercera Subsección B-, el expediente de tutela contra la Sala Administrativa del Consejo Superior de la Judicatura, para que tramite y decida en forma inmediata, conforme a lo establecido en el Art. 37 del Decreto 2591 de 1991 y en armonía con lo señalado en el Art. 1º del Decreto Reglamentario 1382 de 2000.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
- RESUELVE:
- Remitir al Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca -Seccion Tercera Subseccion B-, el expediente de la accion de tutela promovida por Roger Lemis Socarras Lastra en representacion del senor Andres Alfonso de la Hoz Paz contra la Sala Administrativa del Consejo Superior de la Judicatura, para que la tramite y decida en forma inmediata.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.